Close

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472


    Yes Reputation No

    VF-Engineering supercharged Lamborghini Huracan vs. stock McLaren 675LT

    The McLaren 675LT is a very impressive piece of engineering and in stock form is basically a 140 mile per hour car through the 1/4 mile. A stock Lamborghini Huracan 5.2 V10 is significantly slower with its naturally aspirated motor putting it roughly in the 130 mph trap speed range.

    Click here to enlarge

    This Huracan is not stock though and has an Eaton TVS2300 blower from VF-Engineering. We all know the V10 when boosted is a monster as recent twin turbo Huracan builds have shown.

    The 675LT is rear wheel drive and the all wheel drive Huracan takes it easily off the line. The Huracan just continues to pull and ends up trapping about 10 miles per hour higher than the McLaren.

    The VF-Engineering supercharger definitely works well although one has to wonder how much faster a turbo Huracan would be in comparison. Additionally, the driver of the Huracan hit the limiter several times which had an impact. Someone needs to practice their shifting.


    VF Engineering Supercharged Huracan LP610-4 Specs:

    Supercharged: 805 hp / 610 ft/lbs
    Eaton TVS2300 Roots supercharger 7.5psi
    Aluminum intake manifold
    Integrated dual air/water after cooling system
    ECU software calibration flash
    6061 Aluminum intake manifold
    Internal bypass system
    High flow dual throttle body inlet
    Dual Air water charge cooler system
    Polypropylene water reservoir
    OEM high density water radiator
    Bosch water pump
    Hard anodized 6061-T6 aluminum bracket
    OEM 7 rib serpentine belt and tensioner FEAD
    High flow MAF housings
    2x K&N induction filters with pre-filters
    Hex Flash ECU tuning

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Tampa Bay Area, FL
    Posts
    199
    Rep Points
    650.1
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    7


    Yes Reputation No
    As bad and prolific as the sounds of the rev limit was, I'm wondering if it may have been caused by a no/delayed shift condition with the Huracan's DCT not coping well with the added power

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by PianoProdigy Click here to enlarge
    I'm wondering if it may have been caused by a no/delayed shift condition with the Huracan's DCT not coping well with the added power
    I don't think that's it. He just seemed to time it poorly.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    410
    Rep Points
    624.0
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    7


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by PianoProdigy Click here to enlarge
    As bad and prolific as the sounds of the rev limit was, I'm wondering if it may have been caused by a no/delayed shift condition with the Huracan's DCT not coping well with the added power
    You can actually hear his second shift being on time and it not over revving. The rest of his timing was just flat horrible shifting.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    2,192
    Rep Points
    3,261.0
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    33


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    I don't think that's it. He just seemed to time it poorly.
    Yeah, that isn't it. Matt Farah did a review of the VF Huracan, car runs flawlessly win driven correctly.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •